See z.B. Louis Henkin, Human Rights Treaty Series: The Ghost of Senator Bricker, 89 am. J. Int`l L. 341, 343-44 (1995) (arguing that RUDs that are frustrated by the ability of the United States to fully fulfill its obligations under certain human rights treaties through existing national law render treaties unnecessary and incompatible with their objective and purpose); Fourth recast: project 2, a. O. 28, § 105 cmt. 3 (“R]eservations are more generally prohibited by international law if they are “incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty”. (referring to the Vienna Convention, footnote 13, Article 19(c)). In the case of agreements between Congress and the executive and executive agreements concluded under treaties, the nature of the termination may be dictated by the underlying treaty or by the status on which the agreement is based.189 For example, in the case of executive agreements concluded under a treaty, the Senate may make its approval of the underlying treaty conditional on the requirement; that the President does not enter into or terminate executive agreements under the authority of the treaty without the treaty of senator or congress. 190 And in the event of an agreement between Congress and the executive, Congress may, in the statute authorizing or implementing the agreement, dictate how the termination occurred.191 In the case of an executive agreement, it seems generally accepted that if the president has the independent power to enter into an executive agreement, the president may terminate the agreement independently, even without the consent of Congress or the Senate.
186 Thus, observers seem to agree that while the Constitution gives the president the power to enter into single executive agreements, the president can also unilaterally denounce those agreements.187 The same principle would apply to political commitments: to the extent that the president is empowered to make non-binding commitments without the consent of the Senate or Congress, the President may also unilaterally withdraw from these obligations. .188 The State Department publishes the U.S. Treaty Series and other international agreements. TIAS “briefs” are accumulated annually in U.S. treaties and other international agreements. These volumes, published since 1950, serve as a compendium of treaties and agreements to which the United States has belonged in recent years. Prior to 1950, the texts of treaties and other international agreements were printed in United States Statutes at Large. This power has been exercised since the early years of the Republic.”; Ladies &Moore v. Regan, 453 U.S. 654, 680 (1981) (recognition of the President`s power to settle the claims of U.S. nationals and to conclude “that Congress has implicitly approved the practice of settling claims by executive agreement”); United States v.
. . .